Nozzle Design Analysis Low-Pressure Sootblower Long Retractable Type on the Boilers Subcricital Power Plant

Main Article Content

Ika Yuliyani
Ilzam Multazam Ramadan

Abstract

Conventional high-pressure sootblowers (148 bar, 492°C) in coal-fired power plants frequently suffer from mechanical failures (e.g., valve leaks, pipe erosion) and excessive energy consumption due to pressure drops. These issues necessitate an alternative solution to improve boiler efficiency and reduce maintenance costs. This study designs a retractable low-pressure nozzle utilizing intermediate-pressure turbine steam (12.13 bar, 395°C) to address these challenges. Through the development of a divergent full-cone nozzle (throat/exit diameters: 15.45/35.87 mm) and verification via Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations, the nozzle achieved supersonic flow characteristics (Mach 1.2–1.7) with a steam mass fraction of 99.99%, while reducing pressure drop by 67% (4.77 bar compared to the conventional 14.8 bar). Field tests conducted at PLTU Banten 2 Labuan confirmed an effective cleaning area of 1.028 m² at a distance of 2.135 meters, demonstrating superior performance compared to traditional systems. Furthermore, the system achieved potential annual savings of approximately $3,981 per unit through reduced energy and maintenance costs. The results demonstrate that this low-pressure nozzle design not only mitigates slagging and fouling with lower operational risks but also offers a sustainable, energy-efficient, and economically viable alternative for improving the performance and reliability of subcritical coal-fired boilers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Yuliyani, I., & Ramadan, I. M. (2025). Nozzle Design Analysis Low-Pressure Sootblower Long Retractable Type on the Boilers Subcricital Power Plant. Fluida, 18(1), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.35313/fluida.v18i1.5502
Section
Articles

References

[1] Akbar Bagaskara et al., “Indonesia Energy Transition Outlook 2023: Tracking Progress of Energy Transition in Indonesia: Pursuing Energy Security in the Time of Transition,” Inst. Essent. Serv. Reform, p. Please cite this report as: IESR (2022). Indonesia, 2023, [Online]. Available: www.irena.org

[2] RI Fiscal Policy Agency, MoF, “CIF Accelerating Coal Transition (ACT): Indonesia Country Investment Plan (IP),” Consult. Draft, no. October, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://fiskal.kemenkeu.go.id/docs/CIF-INDONESIA_ACT_IP-Proposal.pdf

[3] Harun Bilirgen, “Slagging in PC boilers and developing mitigation strategies,” Fuel, vol. 115, pp. 618–624, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.07.034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.07.034

[4] Yan Xu, Kun Yang, Jiahui Zhou, and Guohao Zhao, “Coal-biomass co-firing power generation technology: Current status, challenges and policy implications,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 9, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12093692. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093692

[5] Muhammad Hasan Basri, Tijaniyah, and Risto Moyo, “Slaging Analysis Based on Boiler Wall Temperature at PLTU Paiton Unit 3,” J. Ilm. Tek. Elektro Komput. dan Inform., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 363–374, 2023, doi: 10.26555/jiteki.v9i2.26202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26555/jiteki.v9i2.26202

[6] Tri Yoga Utama and Nanang Ruhyat, “ANALYSIS OF BOILER EFFICIENCY AND NPHR WITH THE USE OF SOOT BLOWER IN A 315 MW COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT,” vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 80–89, 2024, doi: 10.24853/sintek.18.2.80-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24853/sintek.18.2.80-89

[7] R. S. Hartenberg and Glenn R. Fryling, Combustion Engineering, vol. 8, no. 4. 1967. doi: 10.2307/3102126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3102126

[8] Universitas Gadjah Mada, “Analisa kerusakan material lance tube pada sootblower tito aprilianto, lilik dwi setyana,st.,mt.,” p. 337289, 2015.

[9] Hendri, Suhengki, and Amru Fathony Lubis, “Pengaruh Fouling Terhadap Laju Perpindahan Panas,” J. Power Plat, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 48–57, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33322/powerplant.v6i1.72

[10] Danny S. Tandra, Honghi Tran, Markus Bussmann, and Andrew K. Jones, “Low pressure sootblowing technology - The state of development,” 2012 TAPPI PEERS Conf. Build. a Sustain. Futur., no. August 2016, pp. 516–533, 2012.

[11] A. Kaliazine, D. E. Cormack, H. Tran, and I. Jameel, “Feasibility of using low pressure steam for sootblowing,” Pulp Pap. Canada, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 34–38, 2006.

[12] J. Östlund and B. Muhammad-Klingmann, “Supersonic flow separation with application to rocket engine nozzles,” Appl. Mech. Rev., vol. 58, no. 1–6, pp. 143–176, 2005, doi: 10.1115/1.1894402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1894402

[13] Yanyu Zhang, Fengrong Liu, Shanshan Liu, and Huijie Zhang, “Prediction of condensation shock in supersonic nozzle: Comparison between high-pressure and low-pressure conditions at different of superheating degree,” Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 314, p. 121818, May 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2025.121818. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2025.121818

[14] M. I. Jameel, Donald E. Cormack, Honghi Tran, and Thomas E. Moskal, “Sootblower optimization,” Tappi J., vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 135–142, 1994.

[15] D. E. Cormack and Honghi Tran, “Sootblower optimization,” no. February, 2016.

[16] Kholofelo Errol Malatji and D. V. V. Kallon, “Investigating soot blowing mechanism of boilers,” Proc. Int. Conf. Ind. Eng. Oper. Manag., pp. 5988–5997, 2021, doi: 10.46254/an11.20211009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46254/AN11.20211009

[17] SolidWorks, “An Introduction to Flow Analysis Applications with SolidWorks Flow Simulation,” Eng. Des. Technol. Ser., 2010, [Online]. Available: https://www.solidworks.com/sw/docs/Flow_Sim_StudentWB_2011_ENG.pdf