The Use of Authentic Materials Toward Students' Critical Thinking Skill

Main Article Content

Iis Sulyaningsih

This study was conducted to investigate the use of ‘authentic materials’ in reading to promote students’ critical thinking. Critical thinking ability becomes important since it includes analyzing problems, making decisions, and solving problems that will affect daily life attitudes. A qualitative method was applied in this research: the data were analyzed, referring to critical reading questions and text analysis framework by Robert McGregor (2001).  The results show  that students’ thinking skill level is analyzed by referring to the stages of Critical Thinking Rubric and  Bloom’s Taxonomy. This study  discovered that authentic materials can be used as effective teaching materials to promote students’ critical thinking abilities. However, the  students’ thinking ability was in the comprehension stage. This implies that the use of authentic materials should also  be supported by other aspects such as; suitable chosen texts and appropriate teaching methods. 


Keywords: authentic materials, critical thinking, critical reading
Alwasillah, A. C dan Puncochar, J. (2016). Memberdayakan Pendidikan Tinggi di Indonesia. Indonesia: Pustaka Jaya.
Beyer, Barry. (1997). Improving Student Thinking. Alyn and Bacon. CaliforniaState University.
Chaffee John. (2000). Thinking Critically. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Chaffee John. (2002). Critical Thinking, Thoughtful Writing. Boston: HoughtonMifflin Company.
Chouari, A. (2016). Teaching critical thinking in Moroccan higher education: Challenges and opportunities. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 7(2), 457-467.
Cottrell, Stella. (2005). Critical Thinking Skill. NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Emilia, E. (2010). Teaching Writing: Developing Critical Learners. Bandung: Rizqi
Ferrer, E., & Staley, K. (2016). Designing an EFL Reading Program to Promote Literacy Skills, Critical Thinking, and Creativity. CATESOL Journal, 28(2), 79-104.
Fisher, A. (2001). Critical Thinking: An Introduction. Cambridge University.
Harmer, Jeremy. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching 4th Edition.Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
http://www.utoronto.ca/writing/critrdg.htm
Husna, N. (2019). DEVELOPING STUDENTS’CRITICAL THINKING THROUGH AN INTEGRATED EXTENSIVE READING PROGRAM. Teflin Journal, 30(2), 212-230.
Knott, D. (2005). Critical Thinking towards Critical Writing.
Lipman, Mathew. (1991). Learning to Think, Thinking to Learn. Pergamon Press. Lipman, Mathew. (2003). Thinking in Education. Cambridge University Press.
Manion, Lawrence and Cohen, Louis. (1994). Research Methods in Education.J&L.
McGrath, I. (2002). Materials Evaluation and design for language teaching.Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd
Morgan, Wendy. (1997). Critical Literacy in the Classroom. NY: Routledge.
Muirhead, B., DeNigris III, J., & Perlman, J. R. (2016). Effective Critical Thinking Technology Pedagogy. INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 11.
Norris, Stephen & Ennis, Robert. (1990). Evaluating Critical Thinking. Midwest
Reichenbach, B. (2001). Introduction to Critical Thinking. New York: McGraw- Hill Higher Education.
Rose, David. (2008). Reading to Learn. Melbourne.
Ryandani, V., Nurkamto, J., & Sarosa, T. (2014). The Use of Authentic Materials on Teaching Reading and Its Effects on Students’ Reading Motivation. English Education, 6(3), 263-269.
Sari, F. P., Hafifah, G. N., & Mayasari, L. (2020). The Use of Authentic Material in Teaching Reading Descriptive Text: Review of Literature. Academic Journal Perspective: Education, Language, and Literature, 8(2), 122-134.
SULYANINGSIH, I. (2010, October). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Melalui Pengajaran Reading. In Prosiding Industrial Research Workshop and National Seminar (Vol. 1, pp. 33-1).
Wallen & Fraenkel. (1993). How to design and Evaluate Research in Education.Singapore: Mc Graw Hill Inc.